But what about
doctors and hospitals getting paid at the current Medicare rate, which
is less than the private insurance rate? I was in the insurance industry
and know that doctors and hospitals charged a lot less when people paid
out of pocket. And they charged a lot more
when people had health insurance, we might even say gouged them. So
both doctors and hospitals are still going to make a profit even if the
current Medicare payments are the same. They just won't get super rich
off them, so sorry.
Plus this article notes: "Other
studies of the Sanders plan assume that Medicare will increase its rates
to keep up with or even slightly exceed costs -- though that would levy
a heavier burden on taxpayers. Plus, proponents say, medical providers
will be able to shrink administrative costs, which will save them money,
and they will benefit from everyone having coverage.
"'The
vast majority of doctors will not get paid less,' Jayapal told
reporters before unveiling her bill. 'In fact, they'll be seeing many
more clients and they won't have to spend sometimes up to 25% of their
time on administrative stuff.' To contain health care costs, Jayapal
wants to pay hospitals under a so-called global budget system, which
other developed countries use.
"So does Maryland,
which has specified the amount of annual revenue hospitals can receive
from Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers since 2014. An analysis by
research group RTI International in 2017 found that hospitals adjusted
their rates to remain within their budgets, but that didn't hurt them
financially. Also, hospitals reduced spending on their emergency
departments and some other outpatient services and saw admissions
decline. They also curtailed unnecessary care among Medicare
beneficiaries."
And this article
makes clear that doctor salaries and hospital fees in the US are far
higher than in places with well-functioning single-payer systems. That
is, they are gouging. With lower rates and reduced admin costs they
would still turn a healthy profit, just not the killing they're used to.
"The
senator [Sanders] almost always suggests that Medicare for All would
generate savings exclusively by reducing the costs of administration and
pharmaceuticals; the exorbitant salaries of American doctors, or
price-gouging by monopolistic hospitals, typically goes unmentioned. By
all indications, Sanders shares the view that Gaffney ostensibly
endorses here: reducing nonadministrative hospital costs is not a
priority for health-care justice."
"After all,
hospitals account for roughly one-third of all health-care spending in
the United States — and they are one of the primary sites of
price-gouging in our system. As HuffPost’s Jonathan Cohn explains:
'[R]educing
health care spending is very much the point of health care reform and
it’s not difficult to make the case that hospitals are a logical place
to find big savings. Prices here in the U.S. are much higher than in
other countries, even for everyday services like knee replacements and
routine baby deliveries, with scant evidence that the care here is
better.
'The story is the same within the U.S.,
where hospital prices vary enormously from region to region. It’s not
the hospitals with the best outcomes charging the highest prices,
research has shown pretty consistently. It’s the ones with the most
market power — in some cases, because they have monopolies and are
basically able to demand what they want from private insurers.
'All
of that suggests that the hospitals could handle major reductions
without harm to access to quality. “The evidence is pretty clear that
there’s room to cut without major damage,” says Loren Adler, associate
director of the USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy.'"
"While
there is a lot of administrative waste due to our private insurance
system, even relatively optimistic estimates put savings that could be
wrung from administrative simplicity at around 13 to 15 percent
…American health care spending cannot be lowered anywhere close to
Canada or Sweden or France levels unless salaries for American doctors,
lab cost, MRI scans, and hospital prices are lowered as well. Prices
would need to be cut across the board because the United States overpays
in basically every part of the industry.
"American
specialists make effectively three times what similar doctors make in
Sweden and twice what they do in France or the UK. This is a problem
that is only getting worse. Hospital prices for the same procedures have
grown dramatically faster than inflation. Many hospitals are so
comically bloated and inefficient they don’t even know how much it
actually cost them to perform common procedures. Average physician
income has grown by nearly $100,000 since 2011."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.