In this article Laske evaluates two texts on the green economy for dialectical thinking. One is more so than the other but both are deficient in left quadrant elaboration. He notes that in additional to right quadrant structures we also need "a change in the mind-sets of
citizens in industrialized and emerging countries" (20). This entails
"a new paradigm [...] driven by a rethink of the design purpose and
intention of the system including all previous leverage points like
goals, structure, rules, delays and parameters" (20). On 22 he lists
some of the characteristics of this new paradigm:
"Dialectical
thinking about governance and (green) economics needs to confront rather
than to shy away from ethical debates on values and goals of our
economic system. What is needed is to look at all the ingredients, not
only parameters and rules, but also structures, goals and assumptions of
our growth paradigms. Looking differently at progress, measuring costs
of social and environmental externalities beyond GDP is part of this.
For a transformative 'living' green economy, it may be necessary to
bring what is currently marginal in our economic system to its centre.
For example, cultural concepts like care, precaution, conservation and
sufficiency might be introduced. Concepts of governance need to revisit
current privileges, incentives, constraints and punishments. This could
include new negatives, i.e.corrective feedbacks and transparent
information flows. Injecting life into a green economy could mean
acknowledging and building on the power of the citizen’s domain of
psychological and cultural identities and global citizenship."Now whose agenda sounds like that, really?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.